Thursday, 29 March 2018

Miscellaneous Leather 70: Leather Mini-Skirts (Part Fourteen)

More leggy lovely ladies squeezed into thigh-skimming and mostly tight leather mini-skirts:





























7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the above comment was posted on mini skirts no. 2 (Code 160)

      Delete
    2. Poetic words as ever, chrissieppooh57!

      Delete
  2. thank you Pippa for the complement, but who are you?
    are you the organizer, the mind behind the magnets,
    and do you wear leather yourself and look like a poem?
    if so, ask you to show yourself, come out from behind
    the stage, and assume your proper place with the leather
    ladies.......what should you wear....i have a suggestion there....
    you show only pants and skirts of kind so tight they burst
    at the seams....i don't wan to be forward or pushy....but
    have you ever considered featuring softest, most supple,
    shiniest coats of leather of the most non threatening kind....
    you see your ladies of the lake are a bit/lot intimidating...they are dressed so sharp, what we gentler menfolk really
    need more than anything is something non threatening to
    our ageing libidos, something that encourages us gently,
    such as the soft supple folds of a loose fitting leather coat
    in non threatening colours such as brown, and green, and white,
    they should contrast with the colour of the woman being portrayed,
    the idea is to represent woman as a safe haven and protective
    being, something like a shepherdess herding her sheep,
    the thought picture that she should project to the man being
    come to me, little lost sheep, with me you need never fear,
    with me have you found your safe zone, i'll make you a nest
    and a home - in other words the woman should let out her
    maternal protective instincts, rather than trying to vamp the
    man,,,,look, i'm not talking about having a new mother, at least
    i think not, what I am suggesting is a softening of the clothes
    and the attitudes if the models away from look at my clothing
    and bodily parts to something a little more romantique, and
    gently sexy and sweet....that way you would be performing
    a truly great service for lonely blokes such as me....now wouldn't that be something.....how could we but fail to SMILE for thee? .....
    assessment: traditional sex stereotypes are not for everyone/
    many people not cut from the old of the very masculine,
    need something softer known as sensuality....and soft supple
    shiny leather coats in assorted colours, styles, and lengths,
    don't you agree that would hit the spot with libidinally weaker men.
    even if they can't climax out each time, the sight of flowing leather worn by women who show that they care....that would be one step
    forward for sense and sensibility, and one giant step forward,
    towards giving lonely men with weak libidos, something more
    than that which presently meets the eyes (on your blog).

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your poetry and kind comments but sorry I won't be coming out from behind the curtain. The pleasure for me is mainly tight sexy leather on the female form- I could select on purer aesthetics and romanticism but - for me- that was never the fun of creating and updating this blog. It's nice that others like it but my philosophy is to devote my time to what pleases me.

      Delete
  4. Hello Pippa, as creator of this blog it is of course your prerogative
    to choose what styles you feature. If you feel there is no place
    for something different than tight leathered girls, because these
    are the only kind that please you, then I completely understand.
    I just bethought myself to draw your attention to something
    which you might not have thought of before, and perhaps didn't
    know what your were missing! But if you have considered this
    question from all angles, and arrived at the only right formula
    for you, then, again I completely understand.

    ReplyDelete